?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Mr. Monk's Writers Get an F

The prissy FBI agents. Oh come ON.

You do NOT NOT NOT leave hazardous chemicals in spray bottles that look just like perfume atomizers. NO FBI person will do this. ALL such chemicals WILL be in clearly labeled hazardous material standardized containers. NO WAY does Monk spray a 'cleaning spritzer' of highly caustic chemical onto a TV screen by mistaking it for water.

Also, there is no fucking pet store in SF where you can just walk in and buy a ferret. Thanks to paranoia that domesticated Ferrets would destroy California, since 1895 it has been illegal to import, sell or OWN a ferret in California. No pet store sells them.

The 'drink coaster' joke is also very, very old. Monk has seen computers used before, many many times. He isn't a stupid man and will know the difference between a CD slot and a drink coaster.

Feh. Bad writing episode.

EDIT: "I want all street musicians off the street except one!"

IN SAN FRANCISCO.

The writers have lost sight of the fact that the humor in Mr. Monk's life arises from the absurdities of real life, not from stupid cartoon caricatures being even more broken that Mr. Monk.

Is there a way to give these guys an F- ??

Comments

drath
Feb. 24th, 2007 07:03 pm (UTC)
Good summary, which also reflects what I was trying to say as well.

Along the same lines, I have the darndest spot of difficulty determining just when humor crosses over the line. There is a spoof on the Oompa Loompas in an ep of "Family Guy" dealing with the character supercop in a wheelchair asking where the ramp is for the tour of the factory.

The Chumba-Wumbas (stand-ins for the Oompa-Loompas) sing "What do you do when you're stuck in a CHAIR" "Finding it hard to go up and down STAIRs" "What do you think of the one you call God" "Isn't his absense slight - ly - odd?"

I can see some as reflecting on this as a microcosm of the JOB story (very very micro) and others considering it outright blasphemey. What do you think about the religious acceptability of such a line? Looks like this has become a slight tangent so apologies in advance.
foomf
Feb. 24th, 2007 07:48 pm (UTC)
Oh, it's clearly blasphemous, but it's only a slightly more overt blasphemy than anything else on that particular show (or many others.)

However, as far as I've ever seen, it's the religious whose beliefs or power or position or income are threatened by this kind of thing, who get upset. God doesn't seem to react to it any more (or less) than to any other evidence of human disbelief, disrespect, contempt, or scorn. That is to say, He declines to provide any more concrete evidence of His existence by erasing the blasphemers.
drath
Feb. 24th, 2007 08:19 pm (UTC)
And that's kind of where my difficulty comes in. My gal says that she believes God has a sense of humor, and she is extremely devout and doesn't like profanity, to give a reference point for her level of commitment.

Would you like to continue this subthread in personal email?
foomf
Feb. 24th, 2007 11:47 pm (UTC)
Up to what you're comfortable with.

I believe God has a sense of humor. Anyone who's ever seen themselves naked ought to know that.

Disliking profanity and vulgarity indicate a personal fastidiousness, and isn't a bad thing at all. I swore like a sailor for years, and only got over it because Penny wanted me to. There's also a matter of respect for other people, and for their comfort. And of course, if you believe in God then you don't want to be using His name in vain, any more than you want to be in a room with someone who uses your name as a vulgar oath.

Profile

BadgerBadgerBadger
foomf
Steve Hutchison

Latest Month

January 2014
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow